← Back to feed
2026-07-30visiondata

ScaFE: Data-Efficient Scar Classification with LLM-Generated Clinical Feature Programs

Ruman Wang, Hangting Ye

PDF preview for ScaFE: Data-Efficient Scar Classification with LLM-Generated Clinical Feature Programs
Read on arXiv →

Key claim

LLM knowledge enables efficient, auditable scar classification.

In plain English

Imagine you're a healthcare provider trying to classify different types of scars from clinical photographs. The challenge lies in accurately distinguishing between keloids and hypertrophic scars, especially when you have limited expert-labeled data and varying image quality from different hospitals. Current methods often rely on complex end-to-end image models that require large amounts of data, which can be a problem when data governance restricts sharing sensitive patient information. This is what's called a data dependency issue, and it can lead to inconsistent and hard-to-audit decisions when using hosted vision-language models (VLMs).

To address these challenges, the authors propose a method called ScaFE, which stands for Scar Feature Engineering. Instead of directly asking a model to diagnose images, ScaFE uses a large language model (LLM) to extract clinical knowledge and generate deterministic feature programs that measure visible scar attributes. These programs run in a secure local environment, ensuring that patient data remains private while still allowing for the extraction of useful insights. The results are promising: ScaFE achieved an 81.0% accuracy on a diverse dataset, outperforming existing methods by a significant margin. This approach not only enhances classification accuracy with less data but also provides a more transparent and auditable process for medical image analysis, which is crucial in healthcare settings.

Novelty
8.0/10

The approach of using LLMs to create executable feature programs for medical image classification is a meaningful extension of existing methods.

Reliability
8.0/10

The evaluation on diverse hospital data with clear metrics supports the reliability of the results.

Deep reliability assessment

The methodology supports data-efficient, cross-site medical image classification through local and auditable feature programs, but the robustness claim is not strongly supported as all models degrade under acquisition shifts.

Reproducibility

No open source code or dataset is mentioned in the paper.

Key figure

Figure 2 analyzes the search-loop, showing held-out balanced accuracy for ScaFE and its ablations, and validation metrics across refinement rounds.

Benchmark results

~600 photographs from three hospitalssite-macro balanced accuracy: 81vs BiomedCLIP+10.0%SOTA